<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FreeNAS vs Openfiler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/</link>
	<description>Promoting Free Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brazen</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>Brazen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>The problem with lvm snapshots, though, is they kill the volume&#039;s performance.  ZFS snapshots have negligible impact on performance.  More than 2 snapshots on LVM and disk access becomes unusable, however I&#039;ve had up to 10 ZFS snapshots and could not see any performance degradation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with lvm snapshots, though, is they kill the volume&#8217;s performance.  ZFS snapshots have negligible impact on performance.  More than 2 snapshots on LVM and disk access becomes unusable, however I&#8217;ve had up to 10 ZFS snapshots and could not see any performance degradation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-6694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-6694</guid>
		<description>Linux&#039;s LVM can do copy-on-write snapshots and clones almost instantly, too.  No rsync needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux&#8217;s LVM can do copy-on-write snapshots and clones almost instantly, too.  No rsync needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvaro Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-6429</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvaro Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-6429</guid>
		<description>The best feature of FreeNAS is ZFS.  An incredible file system that can take snapshots of itself almost instantly. Compare this to copying to another file system with RSYNC to get the same effect. This in itself has made it my NAS of choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best feature of FreeNAS is ZFS.  An incredible file system that can take snapshots of itself almost instantly. Compare this to copying to another file system with RSYNC to get the same effect. This in itself has made it my NAS of choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basti</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Basti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-437</guid>
		<description>&quot;For FreeNAS, the browser admin access is via plain-text (http).&quot;
Default is http, but you can switch to https in FreeNAs too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For FreeNAS, the browser admin access is via plain-text (http).&#8221;<br />
Default is http, but you can switch to https in FreeNAs too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Websites tagged "freenas" on Postsaver</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Websites tagged "freenas" on Postsaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-284</guid>
		<description>[...] - FreeNAS vs Openfiler saved by theescapist2009-09-10 - InfoWorld’s award for FreeNAS saved by Tlmedia2009-09-10 - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; FreeNAS vs Openfiler saved by theescapist2009-09-10 &#8211; InfoWorld’s award for FreeNAS saved by Tlmedia2009-09-10 &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebase</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>sebase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-280</guid>
		<description>In fact, the iSCSI target service based-on Openfiler is much stronger than the one based-on FreeNAS.  On Openfiler(V2.3), we can creat several iSCSI targets, and set different space for each one.  On FreeNAS(V0.69 Stable), usually only one iSCSI target can be created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, the iSCSI target service based-on Openfiler is much stronger than the one based-on FreeNAS.  On Openfiler(V2.3), we can creat several iSCSI targets, and set different space for each one.  On FreeNAS(V0.69 Stable), usually only one iSCSI target can be created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learn FreeNAS &#187; FreeNAS vs Openfiler Review Forgets that FreeNAS can do iSCSI</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Learn FreeNAS &#187; FreeNAS vs Openfiler Review Forgets that FreeNAS can do iSCSI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] Linuxbsdos.com website has a good review of FreeNAS compared to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linuxbsdos.com website has a good review of FreeNAS compared to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holiday Buyer's Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Holiday Buyer's Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] di rete. Sotto il cofano l’M3800 esegue il software di gestione di storage OpenFiler 2.3 (che LinuxBSDos.com indica derivato da rPath Linux). Il dispositivo comprende tre alloggiamenti per dischi e può [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] di rete. Sotto il cofano l’M3800 esegue il software di gestione di storage OpenFiler 2.3 (che LinuxBSDos.com indica derivato da rPath Linux). Il dispositivo comprende tre alloggiamenti per dischi e può [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this good side by side comparison of FreeNAS and OpenFiler. There is  however a small error in your analysis, FreeNAS can also act as an iSCSI target and as such is just as capable to act as a SAN (Storage Area Network) server.

You can learn more about FreeNAS at http://www.freenas.org or http://www.learnfreenas.com.

Thanks, Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this good side by side comparison of FreeNAS and OpenFiler. There is  however a small error in your analysis, FreeNAS can also act as an iSCSI target and as such is just as capable to act as a SAN (Storage Area Network) server.</p>
<p>You can learn more about FreeNAS at <a href="http://www.freenas.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.freenas.org</a> or <a href="http://www.learnfreenas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.learnfreenas.com</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeNAS vs Openfiler Review Forgets that FreeNAS can do iSCSI - FreeNAS News - News</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2008/10/06/freenas-vs-openfiler/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeNAS vs Openfiler Review Forgets that FreeNAS can do iSCSI - FreeNAS News - News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=786#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Linuxbsdos.com website has a worth reading comparison of FreeNAS and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linuxbsdos.com website has a worth reading comparison of FreeNAS and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

