Happy New Year! Forget all that stuff about the Mayan Calendar. Be Cool!

Latest Reviews & Tutorials

  • GhostBSD 2.5 review
  • How to install Takeoff Launcher on Fedora 16 KDE
  • Install Quick Access on Linux Mint 12 KDE or any KDE installation
  • How to install Linux Mint 12 KDE on a btrfs file system
  • Manual disk partitioning guide for Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • How to compile and install Takeoff Launcher on Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • 3 must-have extensions for Fedora 16 and other GNOME 3 installations
  • How to install Razor-qt on Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • How to enable desktop slideshow on Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • KahelOS 111111 review
  • How to install Cinnamon in Ubuntu 11.10
  • How to customize Cinnamon on Fedora 16 and Linux Mint 12
  • How to install Cinnamon on Fedora 16
  • What does Cinnamon bring to the desktop?
  • How to access Microsoft Windows files and folders from Linux
  • How to dual-boot Pear OS Panther 3 and Windows 7
  • How to dual-boot Chakra Linux Edn and Windows 7, part 1
  • Linpus Lite Desktop 1.6 review
  • Chakra GNU/Linux Edn 2011.12 review
  • How to customize Pear OS Linux Panther 3

Anonymity and the Internet


Universal identification is portrayed by some as the holy grail of Internet security. Anonymity is bad, the argument goes; and if we abolish it, we can ensure only the proper people have access to their own information. We’ll know who is sending us spam and who is trying to hack into corporate networks. And when there are massive denial-of-service attacks, such as those against Estonia or Georgia or South Korea, we’ll know who was responsible and take action accordingly.

The problem is that it won’t work. Any design of the Internet must allow for anonymity. Universal identification is impossible. Even attribution — knowing who is responsible for particular Internet packets — is impossible. Attempting to build such a system is futile, and will only give criminals and hackers new ways to hide.

Imagine a magic world in which every Internet packet could be traced to its origin. Even in this world, our Internet security problems wouldn’t be solved. There’s a huge gap between proving that a packet came from a particular computer and that a packet was directed by a particular person. This is the exact problem we have with botnets, or pedophiles storing child porn on innocents’ computers. In these cases, we know the origins of the DDoS packets and the spam; they’re from legitimate machines that have been hacked. Attribution isn’t as valuable as you might think.

Implementing an Internet without anonymity is very difficult, and causes its own problems. In order to have perfect attribution, we’d need agencies — real-world organizations — to provide Internet identity credentials based on other identification systems: passports, national identity cards, driver’s licenses, whatever. Sloppier identification systems, based on things such as credit cards, are simply too easy to subvert. We have nothing that comes close to this global identification infrastructure. Moreover, centralizing information like this actually hurts security because it makes identity theft that much more profitable a crime. Continue reading.

0saves
To have articles like this delivered automatically to your Feed Reader or Inbox, subscribe via RSS or email. For simple comments, use the commenting system, but for more involved assistance, please use the Question & Answer section.

Posts From The Same Category:




Questions & Answers Hola! Looking for an answer to a question but did not find it? Then surf on over to the Questions & Answers section. It's a brand new addition to our site, and we are waiting just to answer your question(s).

Leave a Reply

Trackbacks

Read previous post:
Interview with Olivier Cochard-Labbé, founder of FreeNAS
Internet Explorer’s dominant market share eroding
Windows 7 Sins now in 9 languages!
Close