Happy New Year! Forget all that stuff about the Mayan Calendar. Be Cool!

Latest Reviews & Tutorials

  • How to customize Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • Linux Mint 12 KDE review
  • GhostBSD 2.5 review
  • How to install Takeoff Launcher on Fedora 16 KDE
  • Install Quick Access on Linux Mint 12 KDE or any KDE installation
  • How to install Linux Mint 12 KDE on a btrfs file system
  • Manual disk partitioning guide for Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • How to compile and install Takeoff Launcher on Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • 3 must-have extensions for Fedora 16 and other GNOME 3 installations
  • How to install Razor-qt on Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • How to enable desktop slideshow on Linux Mint 12 KDE
  • KahelOS 111111 review
  • How to install Cinnamon in Ubuntu 11.10
  • How to customize Cinnamon on Fedora 16 and Linux Mint 12
  • How to install Cinnamon on Fedora 16
  • What does Cinnamon bring to the desktop?
  • How to access Microsoft Windows files and folders from Linux
  • How to dual-boot Pear OS Panther 3 and Windows 7
  • How to dual-boot Chakra Linux Edn and Windows 7, part 1
  • Linpus Lite Desktop 1.6 review

Is Android Evil?


AndroidYou thought Android was open? The Android governance model consists of an elaborate set of control points that allows Google to bundle its own services and control the exact software and hardware make-up on every handset. All this while touting the openness rhetoric that is founded on the Apache permissive license used in the Android SDK.

Indeed, Google’s mobile platform is the smartest implementation of open source designed for driving commercial agendas. But before we dig into why, it’s worth discussing why Android’s success has very little to do with open source.

What makes Android tick?
Despite early skepticism, Google’s Android operating system has been unequivocally supported by the mobile industry, including more network operators and handset manufacturers than one can count – with the stubborn exception of Nokia. Android managed to ramp from 1 handset model in 2008 to 50+ models announced for 2010 launch, leaving most industry observers in awe.

The Android success has nothing to do with open source; it’s owed to three key factors:

  1. Apple. As strange as it might seem, Android owes much of its success to one of its arch-rivals. Let me explain. With the unprecedented success of the iPhone and the take-it-or-leave-it terms dictated by Apple to network operators, the carriers have been eagerly looking for cheaper alternatives; as such the tier-1 operators have been embarking on Android projects to produce iPhones for people who can’t afford the iPhone and more importantly, without forking out the 300EUR+ subsidy needed to remain competitive in an iPhone market.
  2. Network operators/carriers around the world are eager to differentiate. Android provides the allure of a unified software platform supporting operator differentiation at a low cost (3 months instead of 12+ months offered by SavaJe, which was also aimed at the MNO customisation market). For larger operators with a software strategy, Android also presents a safe investment, as the mainstream option for bringing down the cost of smartphones. That’s why most Android handset projects are backed by a commercial bipoles of operator + OEM deals, with purchase commitments and NRE fees coming from the operator. Continue reading
0saves
To have articles like this delivered automatically to your Feed Reader or Inbox, subscribe via RSS or email. For simple comments, use the commenting system, but for more involved assistance, please use the Question & Answer section.

Posts From The Same Category:




Questions & Answers Hola! Looking for an answer to a question but did not find it? Then surf on over to the Questions & Answers section. It's a brand new addition to our site, and we are waiting just to answer your question(s).

Leave a Reply

Trackbacks

Read previous post:
Traffic Mining Firewall Logs Could Improve Network Security
ClearOS
ClearOS 5.1 review
Close