Ad
Subscribe by Email
Sign up to automatically receive the latest articles and tutorials in your Inbox.
Reach out & follow us
TwitterFollow us on Twitter
Google PlusJoin a prestigious circle
RSS FeedSubscribe to our RSS Feed
EmailReach out to us via email
Popular
- Windows 8: The most important reason to switch to Linux 41 comments
- Cinnamon proposed to replace GNOME Shell as default DE on Fedora 19 40 comments
- 9 Google Reader alternatives 24 comments
- Upgrading Fedora 17 to 18 with FedUp is elegant, but ... 23 comments
- Ubuntu is not a community distribution 23 comments
- How to dual-boot Fedora 18 and Windows 8 on 1 HDD, with GRUB in a PBR 22 comments
- 4 gui applications for installing Linux from USB key 19 comments
- Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow) review 18 comments
- Hybryde Fusion: A very unique Linux distribution 17 comments
- How to straighten out firewall configuration on Fedora 18 16 comments
Recent Comments
-
no daddy: lousy argument. …
-
MR. FUBO: Part of the problem is that one of those "reliable journalis…
-
Matthew Delaforce: I have Fedora 17 installed and it installed the Firewalld da…
-
MR. FUBO: "Nor are anonymous posters on the internet" PS - here's t…
-
Ken: I've been using Zentyal 3.2.whatever. for about a mounth, it…







Copyright Is Like QWERTY: Locked-In and Retrospective
The term ‘path dependence’ is generally used to describe the development of technological standards and how they ‘lock in’ a given technical solution. The QWERTY keyboard is often given as an example of path dependence – the fact that the costs of changing the keyboard to a better, more efficient solution, hinders change. The same can be said about much of the copyright legislation today, but then at the expense of privacy and other rights.
It is no surprise that the companies making and selling QWERTY keyboards have never been eager to switch standards, as they would then lose their market advantage. In a similar sense many of the legal solutions embedded in how copyright is regulated have become path dependent and locked-in too.
Copyright laws keep on being ‘copied’, even though there are seemingly better solutions out there. The industries that depend on copyright are not in favor of change because this would mean that they would lose authority and power, and possible revenue. The worst consequence of this “path dependence” is that copyright interests gain at the expense of everyone’s privacy.
Let me explain how. Continue reading…
Related articles you might want to read: