Came here in search of an answer to a problem, but didn't find it? Visit the forum @, pick a category and ask a question.

From GNOME 3 to GNOME Classic in 3 extensions, or why GNOME Classic has become redundant

GNOME Classic is a GNOME 3 desktop designed to offer the look-and-feel of a GNOME 2/MATE desktop, that is, of a traditional or classic GNOME desktop.

It’s for people who are not fond of the default GNOME Shell. It comes with every installation of GNOME 3, offered as an option in the login screen’s Session menu.

To use it (GNOME Classic), all you need to do, is select GNOME Classic from the Session menu before logging into the desktop. This screenshot shows part of the login screen from a test installation of a GNOME 3 desktop.
GNOME Classic Login screen

Since Antergos 2014.05.26 was released, I’ve been playing with test installations of the distribution’s GNOME 3 desktop, which is powered by GNOME 3.12.2. The GNOME 3 desktop of that distribution offers a plain-vanilla GNOME Shell in all its annoying glory. So I’ve had to make it a bit more user-friendly by installing a few extensions (see How to customize GNOME 3.12 GNOME Shell). And I’ve also been using the GNOME Classic desktop too.

That made me realize that just by installing three extensions, I can get the GNOME 3 desktop with a default GNOME Shell to look just like GNOME Classic. Just three extensions. Which brings up this question: If I can do that, that is, customize a default GNOME Shell to look exactly like GNOME Classic in less than five minutes, why do we still need GNOME Classic? My answer to that is, we don’t. It’s redundant.

And what are those three extension that will do the magic? They are: Applications Menu, Places Status Indicator, and Window List. Starting from GNOME 3.12, those extensions are usually installed but not enabled in GNOME Tweak Tool. So if you have that utility installed on your GNOME 3 desktop (it is installed by default on GNOME 3.12), just start it, then enable them to experience what GNOME Classic looks and feels like without logging into the default GNOME Classic desktop.

Extra Info: Just before I published this article, Adam Williamson from said that the Antergos GNOME login screen (first screenshot above) is a customized GDM, and not the stock GNOME 3 GDM. I confirmed that by comparing the login screens of Fedora Rawhide GNOME with that of Mageia 4 GNOME. Both are the same and very different from the Antergos login screen. The screenshot below was taken from a test installation of Fedora Rawhide GNOME. By the way, Mageia 4 GNOME is powered by GNOME 3.10.2, while Fedora Rawhide GNOME is currently running GNOME 3.13.2. Fedora Rawhide is what will become Fedora 21, which is scheduled for release sometime later this year.
Fedora Rawhide GNOME GDM

The following screenshots show what the custom GNOME 3 and GNOME Classic desktops look like.

This is the customized GNOME 3 desktop showing the applications menu.
GNOME Shell app menu

And this is the GNOME Classic desktop also showing the applications menu.
GNOME Classic app menu

The customized GNOME 3 desktop showing the Places Status Indicator.
GNOME Shell Places Status Indicator

The GNOME Classic desktop showing the Places Status Indicator.
GNOME Classic Places Status Indicator

The customized GNOME 3 desktop showing the Activities overview.
GNOME Shell activities overview

The GNOME Classic desktop showing its Activities overview.
GNOME Classic activities overview

The customized GNOME 3 desktop showing the app view.
GNOME Shell app view

The GNOME Classic desktop showing its app view.
GNOME Classic app view

The customized GNOME 3 desktop showing a bottom panel with four workspaces, which is made possible by the Window List extension.
GNOME Shell Window List

The GNOME Classic desktop showing a bottom panel with four workspaces.
GNOME Classic Window List

So, do you think the developers still need to be supporting GNOME Classic?

To have articles like this delivered automatically to your Feed Reader or Inbox, subscribe via RSS or email.
Digital Ocean SSD VPS Cloud Server droplets

Digital Ocean is a VPS/Cloud hosting provider. For just $5 per month, you can get yourself a Cloud server with 512 MB of RAM, 20 GB super-fast SSD, free snapshots, plus backups for a minimal fee. All via a simple graphical interface.

And by signing up with this referral link, you can help support this website.

If you are reading this, your ad could also be occupying this space. Contact us to make it happen.

If commenting on this article is closed, please post your comments at


  1. rajnish kalyan says:

    Its lightDM login screen not GDM. You can rectify the article.

  2. rajnish kalyan says:

    Its lightDM login screen not GDM. You can make correction to ur article.

  3. salparadise says:

    It’s hideously ugly and hideously dumbed down. It looks like a Fischer-Price ‘my first computer’ for the under 5′s.

    The Gnome Developers are vandals and barbarians.

  4. Hunkah says:

    Ever since Cinnamon was released, I stopped using Gnome/Gnome Fallback.

    Cinnamon is everything that Gnome 3 should have been… and it is by far my favorite desktop environment. It is totally understandable why Linux Mint is becoming the number one install.

    I’m using Fedora/Cinnamon because I don’t like .deb ways of doing things.

  5. David Sugar says:

    I had never used gnome (2) with two pagers. It is so wasteful and stupid, especially with widescreen monitors. While you could use two panels, gnome (2) had the ability to fold window task management into a single panel, something I consider essential in every environment I have ever used, including lxde, Xfce, KDE, cinnamon, etc. This reconstruction I gather does not have this fundamental and what I consider essential capability. Immediate fail.

    • finid says:

      What is fundamentally “essential” for one user, is “wasteful and stupid” to another. Whether it’s using multiple workspaces, multiple panels, or the “ability to fold window task management into a single panel,”, you’ll always find a group of users that’s for one and against the other.

      Choice, what a beautiful thing! I can’t believe I wrote that after suggesting that GNOME Classic is redundant. Oh, well…

      • David Sugar says:

        And that is precisely the problem with this “classic”, and it reflects problems with the gnome project as a whole as it is presently ran. It only recreates a single form of gnome 2 matching a single take it or leave it vision, and as it happens one I do find particularly useless (though I am sure there must be some who actually did like that layout just as I am sure there are those who must like gnome 3 as it is), while eliminating the actual flexibility and choices that environment did actually have to meet real users needs. Nothing gnome “offers” today meets my needs, and they seem to have chosen to have deliberate roadblocks in reaching that, so I have already chosen something else… xfce and kde :)

  6. tracyanne says:

    Other than the fact that I am able to install a GNOME Classic desktop with GNOME Session Flashback on some older machines that don’t run well with Unity and Compiz, I really don’t care about GNOME Shell.

    Then the next thing I do is replace Nautilus with Nemo.

  7. Er…GNOME Classic *is* those extensions. It’s intentionally implemented as a set of Shell extensions. It’s not a separate set of code.

    • alefa says:

      Exactly. GNOME Classic is just an easy way of enabling those three extensions in one go. I guess it’s especially convenient for large deployments such as those of companies using Red Hat.

Leave a Comment